ATT is the better Fergus alternative for NZ painters and small trade teams that want simpler quoting, faster adoption, flat monthly pricing, customer follow-up, and Xero-connected workflow without taking on a costing-heavy contractor system.
Page last updated: May 2026
| Question | Fergus | ATT | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job costing depth | Costing-heavy contractor workflow | Practical job visibility without the admin weight | ATT is the better fit when a painting team wants daily adoption, not another reporting project. |
| Pricing model | Per-user pricing model | Flat monthly pricing | ATT is easier to budget as a small team adds admin or crew access. |
| Workflow complexity | More complex operational setup | Simpler quote-led workflow | ATT is easier to roll out when the owner needs the team using it every day. |
| AI quoting | ❌ | ✅ | ATT wins when quote speed and pricing support matter. |
| Painter-first fit | ⚠️ Generic | ✅ | ATT wins on day-to-day workflow fit for painting businesses. |
Fergus is known in NZ trade software, but ATT is the cleaner choice when the business does not want a costing-heavy contractor system. Painters usually need faster quoting, better quote follow-up, simple job visibility, scheduling, job notes, and Xero-connected invoicing. ATT is built around that workflow.
The practical win is adoption. A small painting team needs software the owner, admin person, and crew can use without turning the business into a reporting project. ATT keeps the daily workflow simpler and closer to how painting work is actually won.
ATT publishes flat monthly pricing: Quoting at $99 per month and Professional at $199 per month. That makes the cost easier to understand for a small team than software where the final monthly cost depends heavily on users, plan rules, and feature requirements.
For a painting business, predictable pricing matters because admin software is only valuable if it removes more labour than it adds. ATT is designed to reduce the quoting and follow-up admin that directly affects revenue.
Painting work usually starts with an enquiry, site visit, scope, preparation notes, exclusions, written quote, follow-up, acceptance, scheduled crew work, and invoicing. ATT is better aligned to that quote-led path than a platform centred on deeper contractor job costing.
If quotes are slow, follow-ups are missed, and accepted work has to be re-entered into Xero manually, ATT attacks the problem directly.
Get connected with local tradies who can quote your job.
Use ATT to quote faster, win more work, and run your painter business.
Start with the records that matter operationally: customers, open quotes, accepted work, quote templates, standard scope language, follow-up stages, and current jobs. Do not let historical clutter delay the move.
The highest-value migration work is rebuilding your quoting workflow so ATT reflects how you price painting jobs: labour, materials, prep, access, exclusions, GST, payment terms, and acceptance.
ATT is a strong Fergus alternative for painters and small trade teams that want simpler workflow, flat pricing, and AI-assisted quoting rather than deeper costing-led complexity.
Usually because they want simpler day-to-day workflow, flat monthly pricing, AI quoting, and a better fit for painters or smaller trade teams.
Read the wider three-way comparison and job costing software NZ if profitability reporting is your main concern.
Get connected with local tradies who can quote your job.
Use ATT to quote faster, win more work, and run your painter business.